Lazy portfolios are low cost set and forget investments. The idea is they cover the gamut of asset classes, though some better than others, give diversification, and (hopefully) beat the S&P 500 index. As with all portfolios, they should be rebalanced periodically; generally every year.
They are a good way to see what others have done - from professionals and millionaires to second graders.
The portfolio should consist of low-cost mutual funds or ETFs, depending on how you plan to invest. ETFs have brokerage fees, so monthly investing is best done using mutual funds even though they usually have a higher expense ratio.
The key to a good portfolio is:
Since the portfolios consist of a large percentage of stocks, the time horizon is long; in other words, don't put money you need in a year or two into these.
When you start your portfolio has a big difference on long-term performance. For example, if you started at the Dow's peak (The Dow topped out at 14,168.53 on Oct. 9, 2007), you would still be underwater. A good understanding of the expectations of a portfolio is paramount.
Something interesting I read in an Oct 2008 op-ed in the NY Times: Warren Buffett had his entire private stash in government bonds until circa Oct 2008 when he announced he's adding U.S. equities to his private portfolio.
Some of the portfolios have changed over the years.
The VTWSX fund's current allocation is 59% in foreign stocks and 41% in U.S. stocks.
Charles is author of "Winning at a Loser's Game".
Under 40 years old: 100% in stocks.
40 to 50: 90% in stocks,
10% in bonds.
50 to 60: 80% in stocks, 20% in bonds.
60 to
70: 60% in stocks, 40% in bonds.
70 to 80: 50% in stocks, 50%
in bonds.
Ted Aronson, partner in AJO Partners, puts his family's taxable money in this portfolio.
Breakdown: 70% stocks, 30% bonds
This is an aggressive asset allocation. Note that a second grader started this portfolio with the help from his Dad.
Breakdown: 90% stocks, 10% bonds
David Swenson, the chief investment officer at Yale University, recommends the above portfolio in his Unconventional Success. He is a big proponent of equity-oriented allocations for investors with long time horizons.
Breakdown: 70% stocks, 30% bonds
“You only need a few asset classes in your portfolio, and after that there are diminishing returns. The mutual funds you choose to represent those asset classes should be the lowest cost funds you can buy.” –Rick Ferri, CFA on the Bogleheads Forum.
Breakdown: 60% stock, 40% bonds
Right out of Bill’s book, “The New Coffeehouse Investor: How to Build Wealth, Ignore Wall Street, and Get on with Your Life”.
Breakdown: 60% stocks, 40% bonds
Larry Swedroe’s portfolio is tilted toward small-cap and value equities.
Breakdown: 60% stock, 40% bonds
The idea behind Browne’s Permanent Portfolio is that the four asset classes have sufficiently low correlation that the portfolio should be able to put up modest gains each year under just about any circumstance imaginable. This portfolio was heavily discussed on the Boglehead's forum.
Breakdown: 25% stocks, 25% commodities, 50% bonds & cash
Bernstein, author of The Four Pillars of Investing, suggests the above portfolio for investors with a long time horizon. Note that it’s very similar to the first portfolio mentioned above (Roth’s Second Grader Portfolio), but with a much heavier allocation toward small-cap domestic stocks.
Breakdown: 75% stocks, 25% bonds
Originated by Scott Burns, a Dallas financial columnist.
Breakdown: 50% stocks, 50% bonds
Paul Merriman has several indexed portfolios. Here is one of them.
Breakdown: 68% stocks, 32% bonds
Lazy Portfolio Performance - See how some of the portfolios have performed.
VTI encompasses large cap stocks, REITs (about 2.5%), small cap stocks, and mid cap stocks on the NYSE and NASDAQ. It tracks the MSCI US Broad Market index.
VFINX tracks the S&P 500 which includes REITS (about 1.2%).
All fields are required. Email will not be published.
All comments are moderated so they may be delayed before they appear.